Vote count:
0
Regarding anonymous methods, and given a method "WriteConditional" that has the first parameter as a Func, is there a way to even eliminate the extra "() => " syntax?
It seems like you should be able to, since its unambiguous as long as there's no additional overload that would accept string, right?
void Program()
{
IDictionary<string,string> strings = new Dictionary<string,string>() { {"test","1"},{"test2","2"}};
//seems like this 'should' work, because WriteConditional has no other overload
//that could potentially make this ambiguous
WriteConditional(strings["test"],"<h3>{0}</h3>");
//since WriteConditional_2 has two overloads, one that has Func<string> and another with string,
//the call could be ambiguous, so IMO you'd definitely have to "declare anonymous" here:
WriteConditional_2(()=>strings["test"],"<h3>{0}</h3>");
}
void WriteConditional(Func<string> retriever, string format)
{
string value = retriever.Invoke();
if(string.IsNullOrEmpty(value)==false)
Console.WriteLine(string.Format(format,value));
}
void WriteConditional_2(Func<string> retriever, string format)
{
string value = retriever.Invoke();
if(string.IsNullOrEmpty(value)==false)
Console.WriteLine(string.Format(format,value));
}
void WriteConditional_2(string value, string format)
{
if(string.IsNullOrEmpty(value)==false)
Console.WriteLine(string.Format(format,value));
}
asked 21 secs ago
Anonymous method shortest syntax
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire