lundi 30 mars 2015

`>` Operator in Racket w/ 3 Arguments


Vote count:

0




Looking at > in Racket, the following makes sense:



> (> 5 0)
#t


Why does the following evaluate to false?



> (> 5 0 0)
#f


asked 1 min ago







`>` Operator in Racket w/ 3 Arguments

Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire